Thirty years later, why is Droog still influential and a point of reference for young designers?
Maria Cristina Didero: “Droog is relevant because he has created a new course. With Richard I discovered that during their adventure each member has called Droog in a different way, movement, group, platform, collective, which is a good thing because there is a multiplicity of voices and interconnections .
Students today can certainly relate to Droog, obviously in a different way than in the past because today Droog pieces have become a sort of icon, they are part of the most important permanent collections of museums around the world.
Furthermore, the historical context has also changed: for example, when the Rag chair (the seat of Tejo Remy from 1991 formed by an accumulation of rags, ndr) would probably be received differently today than in the past.
We can say that Renny Ramakers actually theorized the Droog movement while he was establishing himself ”.
Richard Hutten: “When we started in 1993, we immediately showed a different mentality and a different approach to design.
Until then, design was about form, about style, with Droog we added layers of concepts and ideas, which could be sustainability, social issues, we did completely different things from what is been done before, we were totally disruptive because we used terms that are widely used today but didn't exist at the time.
In October I attended the graduations of the Design Academy in Eindhoven, by now you hardly see design as an object for mass production, but storytelling and ideas.
And this is because thirty years ago this crazy group of young designers - the Droogs - broadened the field of design and the role of designers, going beyond just creating shapes"