Scenography and architecture. Two different professions, with unsuspected similarities, especially in times when visual culture takes over. We asked set designer Margherita Palli to clarify what the points of contact are today.
What is the difference between scenography and architecture? And how do the two disciplines interact?
Margherita Palli: "They are not two distant professions, until the beginning of the 1900s architects and set designers studied in the same place: the Academy of Fine Arts.
It was only at the end of the 1920s that the faculty of architecture was established and, consequently, designing buildings became a technical rather than an artistic profession. It is an interesting fact, because in reality architecture has always been scenographic, exciting, the bearer of a story.
In Italy, in particular, there are no places without this quality. For better or for worse.
There is a scenographic story in a Baroque church, in a Palladian palace, in the Roman ruins. But there is also in the Villaggio Coppola near Caserta, where Dogman was filmed, the film by Matteo Garrone on the story of the Canaro della Magliana. An objectively ugly and disturbing place chosen to narrate a human fact with a very similar flavour.
And it should not be forgotten that there are characters who have spontaneously carried out both professions.
The real distinction is the aesthetic part: it must be functional. If a building is ugly, it is not because of its scenographic content, but because of the incapacity to authentically fulfill its function, i.e. to be an original expression of contemporary culture".